MathLab with Mr. Ahmed is a math learning website by Ahmed Amasha, a mathematics teacher teaching the American curriculum. Explore Algebra 2, Precalculus, Calculus, and SAT and PSAT Math Prep through lessons, focused practice and printable resources.
In A(t)=A0bt,A0 is initial value and b is the per-period factor.
Worked example 1
01 / A simulated culture begins with 240 organisms and doubles every 30 minutes. With t measured in hours, derive its base −2 and base −e models, calculate the count at 1.25 hours, solve the time to 1200 organisms, and plot the model through that target. Explain the difference between a continuous estimated count and an actual integer count. Show written work; selecting a summary alone is not a complete response. Complete the written work or drawing first. The selected answer checks the result only; your reasoning or drawing needs teacher/self-review.
02 / One doubling takes 30 minutes, or a=6030=0.5 hours. After t hours the number of doubling periods is at.
03 / N0=240.
04 / N(t)=N02at=N0e(ln2)at. Thus r=0.5ln2≈1.386294 per hour. The base −e and base −2 graphs coincide exactly when the unrounded rate is used.
05 / N(1.25)=N020.51.25≈1357.65 organisms; round only the final estimated count to 1358.
06 / N0ert=1200⇒rt=ln(N01200)⇒t=rln(N01200)≈1.161 hours from introduction.
07 / Physical domain: t≥0. The continuous curve estimates an integer population and assumes an unchanged doubling time and no resource limit. It does not assert a fractional organism or indefinite real-world growth.
08 / Reference graph. Open circles: observations or key values. Solid: both equivalent models.
Worked example 2 · Model doubling, recover initial counts and convert bases
A simulated colony was introduced 3.75 hours ago and now has an estimated 1625 organisms. Its doubling time is 45 minutes. Take t=0 at introduction. Recover the initial count without early rounding, write equivalent base −2 and base −e models with time in hours, predict the count 1 hours from now, find when the count reaches 4062.5, and sketch the model from introduction through that target. Show written work; selecting a summary alone is not a complete response. Complete the written work or drawing first. The selected answer checks the result only; your reasoning or drawing needs teacher/self-review.
One doubling takes 45 minutes, or a=6045=0.75 hours. After t hours the number of doubling periods is at. N0=20.753.751625≈50.78125 organisms. Retain this exact expression in later work. N(t)=N02at=N0e(ln2)at. Thus r=0.75ln2≈0.924196 per hour. The base −e and base −2 graphs coincide exactly when the unrounded rate is used. N(4.75)=N020.754.75≈4094.74 organisms; round only the final estimated count to 4095. N0ert=4062.5⇒rt=ln(N04062.5)⇒t=rln(N04062.5)≈4.7414 hours from introduction. Physical domain: t≥0. The continuous curve estimates an integer population and assumes an unchanged doubling time and no resource limit. It does not assert a fractional organism or indefinite real-world growth.
Reference graph. Open circles: observations or key values. Solid: both equivalent models. Written-work review:
Convert the 45− minute doubling time to hours. Derive both the base-two and base −e models, with the natural-log conversion giving a positive rate per hour.
Recover the introduction count by dividing the count at hour 3.75 by its elapsed growth factor. Keep that recovered value unrounded; do not reset time zero to the present.
Evaluate the model at total time 4.75 hours and solve logarithmically for the time to 4062.5 organisms. Label the target time as hours since introduction, not additional hours from the present.
Draw an increasing exponential curve with labeled hour and organism axes, the initial intercept, forecast point and target point. Include the whole requested time interval and explain why the two exact model forms have the same graph.
State the nonnegative-time physical domain and unchanged-rate and resource assumptions. Distinguish a continuous estimated population from a literal fractional organism; round to a whole count only at the reporting stage.
Numerical grading: accept equivalent exact expressions and final values within one unit in the last decimal displayed in the worked solution; for scientific notation apply that tolerance to the mantissa, and allow nearest-whole counts when requested. Preserve intermediate precision, stated units and interval endpoints. Assess each derivation and explanation separately; a selected summary alone is not a complete response.
Textbook reference: Stewart, Redlin & Watson, Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus, 7th ed. (Cengage, 2016). The explanations and practice here are original, organized by textbook section.